Porn News

Tokyo Court Rules Japanese Cartoon Book Obscene

Tokyo- A Tokyo court has ruled a Japanese cartoon book obscene, in a landmark court case that sparked debate on freedom of expression and the position of the country’s ubiquitous ‘manga’ cartoons.

Monotori Kishi, a 54-year-old publisher, was handed a one-year prison sentence, suspended for three years, for violating Japan’s penal code on the sale and distribution of obscene literature.

Presiding Judge Yujiro Nakatani said Misshitsu, or Honey Room, was too graphic.

“Bodies were drawn in a lifelike manner with little attention to concealment (of genitalia), making for sexually explicit expression and deeming the book pornographic matter,” Mr Nakatani said.

About 45% of all books and periodicals sold in Japan are manga. They often contain sexual material.

“Given what’s available it seems an extraordinary decision,” said the BBC’s Tokyo correspondent, Jonathan Head.

“There is so much pornography available in Japan in every form – in films, computer games, cartoons and famously manga and anime – those books of cartoons you can see men reading openly on the train everyday,” he said.

Mr Kishi immediately appealed to the Tokyo High Court.

“It is an infringement on freedom of expression and deals a great blow to the publishing industry,” he told a news conference.

“The verdict will force publishing houses to curb their activities and lead to a decline in manga (comics).”

It was the first ever Japanese court trial in which a comic book was accused of obscenity.

The penal code article on which the prosecution was based, Article 175, does not clearly define what is deemed obscene, but the legal precedent was set by a ruling on a Japanese translation of DH Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover in 1957.

The Supreme Court at that time declared obscenity was anything “unnecessarily sexually stimulating, (which) damages the normal sexual sense of shame of ordinary people, or is against good sexual moral principles”.

Kishi’s defence lawyers had argued that some photographs, videos, or items on the internet, were far more explicit than Misshitsu.

They had also argued that Article 175 violated Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and press.

 

217 Views

Related Posts

New Report Warns Against ‘Rising Tide’ of Conservative Censorship

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A new report published last week by the Chamber of Progress, a U.S. trade group representing many of the leading technology companies, issued an urgent warning against the “rising red tide” of digital censorship promoted by conservatives. Titled…

TTS Offers Free Retesting for ‘Positive’ Results

Talent Testing Service on Monday announced that all talent testing positive for Mgen (Mycoplasma genitalium), Trich (Trichomoniasis), Chlamydia, and/or Gonorrhea will be able to have free retests eight days after their Gold Standard Panel positive result.

Logo Assessment: A Look at the Traits of Recognizable Logos

Creating a captivating logo is much like composing an orchestral masterpiece where the brand’s visual voice resonates as the leading instrument. In this intricate symphony of design, every single note — every color you choose, every unique character, every deliberate…

‘Feed Me’ All Night Long: Ricky Greenwood, Adult Time Go Al Dente

Star Lulu Chu describes "Feed Me" as as “'Teeth' meets 'Jennifer’s Body' meets 'It Follows.'”

Playboy Spirits Launches ‘Play Hard’ Vodka Seltzer

CHICAGO — Playboy Spirits, a joint venture between Spirits Investment Partners (SIP) and PLBY Group, has launched its new premium line of vodka seltzers, Play Hard. Play Hard is a “Ready to Drink” (RTD) category beverage with a focus “on…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.