Porn News

Update: AIDS Healthcare Foundation Goes to the State Supreme Court on Condom Ruling

Don’t see your website contact, sales contacts, company contact, or your email contact? Maybe you need to contact us at [email protected]

from www.laweekly.com – Porn stars must wear condoms! Or not.

Well, if you ask L.A.’s AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Mr. Jim Hats is a must. And even though the group lost a 2nd District Court of Appeal case last month in which it argued that L.A. County health officials must make prophylactics mandatory for the Valley’s adult video industry, the org is appealing the issue to the top — to the California Supreme Court.

That’s according to City News Service, which quotes the latest appeal from AHF:

The statutes in question involve the duty of public health officers to protect the public from the spread of communicable diseases in general, and sexually transmitted diseases in particular. Everyone in the state will benefit from this court’s opinion on the extent to which county departments of public health are immune from judicial scrutiny with respect to the actions the agencies takes (or will not take) to fulfill their statutory duty to combat the spread of communicable diseases in the face of a widely acknowledged epidemic.

The whole story is strange because, in fact, condoms are indeed mandatory under federal and state regulations. But the county says it’s not the one that should enforce them. And L.A.’s City Attorney has said that while the city could enforce Jimmys, it doesn’t have to and doesn’t have the resources anyway.

The state does enforce them, Sporadically. It has a resource issue too. State workplace health officials (Cal/OSHA) say federal law says you shouldn’t be exposed to “bloodborne pathogens” (that would include sperm) at the office. And thus, condoms. Required.

Interestingly, appeals court Justice Richard Aldrich wrote in last month’s denial of AHF’s case that ” … the foundation’s public policy advocacy is better directed at lawmakers to change the laws and workplace regulations.”

No judge: The regs are there. But Cal/OSHA, at the behest of AHF, is working on being more specific in language requiring that employees not be exposed to jizz: A new rule focusing specifically on porn is in the works.

AHF has been on a tear against the porn industry, suing the Adult Industry Medical (AIM) clinic out of existence and filing enough complaints with the state that some porn makers like Larry Flynt’s Hustler video company have been hit with fines for not employing condoms.

But the big smut makers like Flynt seem to chalk up the fines as the cost of doing business. And the industry in general says it will not adopt condoms — people won’t buy videos in which they’re used.

And so, the AHF heads to court once more to put pressure government officials.

178 Views

Related Posts

Blake Blossom and OnlineGirl_ to Co-Host the 2025 AVN Awards Show

AVN Media Network is pleased to announce that adult entertainment superstars Blake Blossom and OnlineGirl_ will co-host the 2025 AVN Awards Show in January.

Meta Admits to Updating Database of Banned Images Based on ‘Media Reports’

MENLO PARK, Calif. — Meta has told its Oversight Board that the company relies on “media reports” when deciding to add images to its permanent database of banned content for its platforms, including Instagram and Facebook.The disclosure came in a…

Flirt4Free Set to Launch $100K Summer Cam Contest

Camming network Flirt4Free on Wednesday announced the upcoming launch of its Hot Summer All-Stars Tournament.

Popular Pakistani Actor and Director Yasir Hussain Proposes Legalizing Porn

ISLAMABAD — Prominent Pakistani actor, director and TV personality Yasir Hussain sparked debate in the majority-Muslim country after suggesting that pornography should be legalized there and society should own up to so many Pakistanis being already habitual consumers. Speaking candidly…

Conservative Taxpayers Group Criticizes KOSA’s Overreach

WASHINGTON — Conservative newspaper The Washington Times published Tuesday an opinion piece by the executive director of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance criticizing KOSA on constitutional grounds.KOSA, wrote TPA’s Patrick Hedger, “has been circulating for years, and the sponsors of the legislation…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.